Cimorelli’s Question of the Day

9 Responses to Cimorelli’s Question of the Day

1. bry says:

   March 31, 2008 at 10:37 pm

   Personally, I think they’re all great, but I’d have to go in this order:

   Howland
   Calipari
   Williams
   Self

   Reply
2. STRI says:

   April 1, 2008 at 10:48 am

   Agreed.

   Reply
3. Doogan says:

   April 2, 2008 at 10:35 pm

   Man, hard to even say. Like you said, they’re all really good. I would go Howland at the top, but I also just think it depends on the team. I’d rather have Williams coaching UNC than Howland, and vice versa. I’d probably put Calipari fourth.

   Reply
4. Rob Smith says:

   April 3, 2008 at 12:37 am

   Calipari is fourth only because he’s Chaney’s bitch. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51-4sJTf7iQ

   Howland is top notch – starting with NAU, then Pitt, and now UCLA, he turns programs around. He is a good recruiter, but at the same time he has only had a very few NBAers throughout his time (Brandin Knight, Trevor Ariza, and Jordan Farmar are the only ones I can think of). He knows what to do with the players he has and succeed in different environments.

   Williams would be next. I saw him at a Nike clinic two years ago and he talked about his up-tempo style, which I’ve really enjoyed throughout the years – no one else knows how to do this better, including the Phoenix Suns (I can only imagine Steve Nash in a Williams system); however, at least to me, he comes off really arrogant about his system as well. This is his downfall and it has shown in his inability to win many more titles when he’s had the best talent team on the court.

   Self is okay. Not sold on him, especially since my roommate from college was a huge Illini fan, so I despise anybody that went there/coached there.

   I think there are better coaches out there – I’ll continue to argue for Bobby Knight any day of the week (I know few will agree), even if he’s just at the studio nowadays.

   Reply
5. Doogan says:

   April 4, 2008 at 10:54 am

   Yeah, I can see the Williams arrogance thing because his rationale is basically, “I have the best players, so I want there to be as many possessions as possible in a game, because then there’s less chance of the inferior opponent getting lucky and beating me”. And he’s right in that thinking, but it’s hard to have that stance and not sound at least a little arrogant.

   Reply
6. freetruman gold ira says:

   April 14, 2014 at 1:20 am

   I’m extremely pleased to discover this web site. I need to to thank you for your time for this fantastic read!!
   I definitely really liked every part of it and I have you book marked to check out new information on your website.

   Reply
7. for rent homes says:

   May 10, 2014 at 3:40 pm

   Somebody necessarily help to make severely articles I would
   state. This is the very first time I frequented your
   website page and so far? I amazed with the research you made
   to make this actual publish amazing. Fantastic
   task!

   Reply
8. house for sale says:

   May 14, 2014 at 3:45 pm

   Everything is very open with a clear description of the issues.

   It was truly informative. Your site is extremely
   helpful. Many thanks for sharing!

   Reply
9. best bonuses in uk casinos online says:

   June 2, 2014 at 10:56 am

   There’s definately a lot to find out about this topic.
   I really like all of the points you have made.

   Reply